Legal Opinion

Vickerman v. Kapp

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1932No. 23468. Department OnePublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, C. J.

This is an action on a promissory note. After trial to the court, the plaintiff was awarded a judgment as prayed for. The defendants have appealed from that judgment.

The case is brought here on the pleadings and the findings of fact; no statement of facts having been certified or sent up. Tfie respondent fias not appeared in this court.

Tfie complaint is in tfie usual form. It declares a cause of action upon a promissory note, which is set out in full; and demands a judgment against the appellant husband and against the community.

The answer contains general denials, and alleges affirmatively…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. A. Leschen & Sons Rope Co. v. Mayflower Gold Mining & Reduction Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  2. Cranston v. West Coast Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Blenz v. FogleWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Jones-Short Motor Co. v. BolinWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Moon Bros. Carriage Co. v. DevenishWashington Supreme Court · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Siler Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Van Geest v. WillardWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Miller v. O'BrienWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. McHugh v. RosaiaWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Puget Sound National Bank of Tacoma v. OlsenWashington Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API