Moon Bros. Carriage Co. v. Devenish
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of tbe superior court for Suo-’ kane county, Huneke, J., entered June 9, 1905, upon findings in favor of tbe plaintiff after a trial on tbe merits before tbe court without a jury, in an action toi recover for goods sold and delivered.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.
— This is an action to recover on account for goods sold and delivered. The complaint, in the usual form, alleges the amounts of sales and the balance due and unpaid. It is also alleged that the sales were made between the 1st day of July and the 4th day of December, 1902, and that the defendants were, during all that time and until the 3d day of February, 1903, copartners doing business under the firm name of Devenish Hardware Company. The defendant Plough answered separately, and admitted the existence of the partnership at the time the goods were Sold and delivered; hut alleged that, after…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Trentor v. PothenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Dellapiazza v. FoleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- State ex rel. St. Joseph & Denver City Rld. v. Comm'rs of Nemaha CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hemenway v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Blenz v. FogleWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Olson v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Alaska Pacific Salmon Co. v. MatthewsonWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Vickerman v. KappWashington Supreme Court · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.