Legal Opinion

United States v. Cohn

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 17, 1912No. 859PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7330 (T. D. 32281).

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Judge

The merchandise involved in this case consists of certain silver necklets, which were imported under the tariff act of 1909. They were assessed with duty by the collector at cumulative rates equal to 85 per cent ad valorem, under the provisions of paragraph 448 of the act, as “brooches, lockets, necklaces, and other articles of personal *274adornment of silver and of brass, plated, some set with imitation precious stones, valued at over 20 cents per dozen pieces.”

The importers duly filed their protest to this assessment, claiming, among other things, that the importations were duitable at 60 per…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. American Bead Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  2. United States v. International Forwarding Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. Bayersdorfer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  4. United States v. BartiromoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  5. United States v. Woolworth Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API