Legal Opinion

Marriage of Martin v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 4, 1986No. C6-85-1429PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Suzanne Martin appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion to increase child support. The trial court’s order amended an order made one month previously which ordered an increase in child support. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

The parties were divorced in 1978. Appellant was awarded custody of the parties’ three children. Respondent, Dean Martin, was ordered to pay $100 per month per child for support. The parties’ oldest child reached majority in April, 1984, and her support is not at issue here. Appellant moved for increased support based on increased earnings of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hadrava v. HadravaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Marriage of Derence v. DerenceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Heaton v. HeatonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Marriage of Winter v. WinterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Giencke v. HaglundCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bormann v. BormannCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  2. Marriage of Stephens v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Marriage of Murray v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API