Legal Opinion

Heaton v. Heaton

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 11, 1983No. CX-81-1215PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

The custodial parent’s request for an increase in child support money was denied by the trial court on the ground that a sufficient change in circumstances had not been shown. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Appellant Sharon A. Heaton was divorced from respondent Ralph R. Heaton in 1970 after 8 years of marriage. The divorce decree, entered pursuant to a stipulation between the parties, granted custody of the two minor children, then 1 and 7 years of age, to Mrs. Heaton and required Mr. Heaton to pay $15 a week for each child as child support and also to be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kaiser v. KaiserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. Lammi v. LammiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Toebe v. ToebeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  4. Soukup v. SoukupNebraska Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Moylan v. MoylanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Hadrava v. HadravaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Marriage of Derence v. DerenceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Marriage of Blomgren v. BlomgrenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Streitz v. StreitzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API