Legal Opinion

Giencke v. Haglund

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 5, 1985No. C6-84-1386PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Ted Giencke appeals from a judgment amending a decree of dissolution with respect to provisions concerning child support. We reverse.

FACTS

The marriage of Ted and Joan Giencke1 was dissolved in 1980. Pursuant to the judgment and decree of dissolution, Ted was required to pay child support for the parties’ two minor children in the amount of $200 per month per child, or $400 per month total.

In 1984 Joan moved to amend the judgment, and after hearing testimony of the parties the court issued an order directing that child support be increased to $270 per month for each…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kirby v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Solon v. SolonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Marriage of Derence v. DerenceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Rubenstein v. RubensteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Moylan v. MoylanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Bruning v. JeffriesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Justis v. JustisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Marriage of Bredeson v. BredesonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Marriage of Martin v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API