Marriage of Winter v. Winter
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge
Mary Winter appeals the trial court’s refusal to modify Laurence Winter’s child support obligation. Although the decree provides for support to terminate when the children reach age 21, the trial court concluded that it had no power to increase the amount of support for those children who are presently 18 years or older. The trial court also found that the circumstances of both parties and the needs of the children had substantially changed, but that the original child support order remained fair and reasonable. Mary Winter contends that she is entitled to attorney’s fees…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kaiser v. KaiserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Marriage of Angelos v. AngelosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Brugger v. BruggerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Letourneau v. LetourneauCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Hampton v. HamptonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Marriage of Katz v. KatzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Marriage of Blomgren v. BlomgrenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Marriage of Price v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- LeTendre v. LeTendreCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Marriage of Hoppenrath v. CullenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.