Marriage of Murray v. Murray
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
*923OPINION
BRUCE C. STONE, Acting Judge.
This is an appeal from an order affirming the referee’s order which increased appellant’s support obligations. Appellant contends the trial court erred in affirming the order increasing his support payments because the trial court and the referee incorrectly measured the change of circumstances and did not follow Minn.Stat. § 518.64, subd. 2 (1986).
We disagree and affirm.
FACTS
The marriage of appellant Richard H. Murray and respondent Marilyn Murray was dissolved pursuant to a stipulated judgment and decree in November 1971. Respondent was awarded custody of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kaiser v. KaiserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Brugger v. BruggerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Marriage of Derence v. DerenceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Tammen v. TammenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Heaton v. HeatonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.