Bormann v. Bormann
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.
Appellant mother challenges the district court’s order denying her motion to modify child support. Because the district court’s findings were insufficient to support its conclusion that mother failed to show that the current support order was unreasonable and unfair, we reverse and remand.
FACTS
The marriage of mother Laurel Anne Bormann, n/k/a Laurel Anne Spence, and father Jon Bernard Bormann was dissolved on April 27,1992. The parties have one child, S.B., born in 1988. At dissolution, the district court found that father’s gross annual income was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Moylan v. MoylanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Marriage of Erickson v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Duluth Herald & News Tribune v. Plymouth Optical Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Quaderer v. ForrestCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alliance for Metropolitan Stability v. Metropolitan CouncilCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- County of Grant v. KoserCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Marriage of Jones v. JarvinenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- In re the Marriage of: Jacqueline Lorraine Bourgoin v. Bradley Joseph Bourgoin, County of Anoka, intervenorCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017