Legal Opinion

Rea v. . Simowitz

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 22, 1946PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

Upon the admission that the negligence of the defendants proximately caused the death of the plaintiff’s intestate, the trial below resolved itself into an inquiry of damages.

The plaintiff’s evidence, which was uncontradicted, tended to show that intestate was a girl nine years of age; that she was a normal healthy child, bright and intelligent; regular in her attendance at school, happy and unusually attractive; of normal physical development for her age, and slightly above the average in size. No evidence of expectancy according to any mortuary table was offered.

Our statute, G. S., 28-174,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Collins v. . LambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. In Re Will of RossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Jeremiah M. Kesler v. . William A. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  4. Coach Co. v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Wilson v. Suncrest Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Murray v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Johnson v. HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Lamm v. LorbacherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Caudle v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Mitchell v. BuchheitSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API