Legal Opinion

Colony Associates Ex Rel. Watson v. Fred L. Clapp & Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 15, 1983No. 8218SC191PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

We determine that defendant’s motion for directed verdict was improperly granted and that judgment notwithstanding the verdict [hereinafter j.n.o.v.] was improper.

G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50(b)(1) allows the grant of a j.n.o.v. in favor of a party who has previously moved for a directed verdict. Graves v. Walston, 302 N.C. 332, 275 S.E. 2d 485 (1981). The defendant twice moved for a directed verdict at trial, including at the close of all the evidence. Thus, he met this requirement.

The standard to be used in deciding if a directed verdict was properly granted in a case like the one sub…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. North Carolina National Bank v. BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Chisholm v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Vaughn v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Leona Derr v. Safeway Stores, Inc., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Harrold v. DowdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Forbes v. Par Ten Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Hayman v. Ramada Inn, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. ESTATE OF SMITH, BY & THROUGH SMITH v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  5. Boyd v. LG DeWitt Trucking Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API