Legal Opinion

Strang v. Hollowell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 6, 1990No. 8910DC690PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

The only issue presented in this appeal is whether defendant Hollowell can be held individually liable for plaintiff’s damages. Defendant contends that he was acting as an agent of Hollowell Auto Sales and therefore cannot be held personally liable. Defendant further asserts that, regardless of the fact that plaintiff was unaware that Hollowed Auto Sales was a trade name for Solar Center, Inc., defendant is nevertheless shielded from individual liability because Solar Center, Inc. fulfilled its legal obligation to disclose its relationship with Hollowed Auto Sales by filing an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miller's Mut. Fire Ins. Ass'n of Alton, Ill. v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Millers Mutual Insurance Ass'n of Illinois v. Atkinson Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Howell v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Palomino Mills, Inc. v. Davidson Mills Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Mas Corp. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. CG&T Corp. v. Board of Adjustment of WilmingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Baker v. RushingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Wilson v. Burch Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. White v. Collins Building, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  5. Atlantic Contracting & Material Co. v. AdcockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API