Legal Opinion
City of Norwood v. Horney
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 26, 2006No. Nos. 2005-0227 and 2005-0228; Nos. 2005-1210 and 2005-1211PublishedCited by 162 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.
{¶ 1} In case Nos. 2005-1210 and 2005-1211, we decide the constitutionality of a municipality’s taking of an individual’s property by eminent domain and transferring the property to a private entity for redevelopment. In doing so, we must balance two competing interests of great import in American democracy: the individual’s rights in the possession and security of property and the sovereign’s power to take private property for the benefit of the community.
{¶ 2} In case Nos. 2005-0227 and 2005-0228, we determine the constitutionality of the provision in R.C. 163.19 prohibiting a court from…
2Cases cited127 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by162 opinions
- State v. BodykeOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. Adams (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- Moore v. City of MiddletownOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. GardnerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Midwest Media Property, L.L.C v. Symmes TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
157 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.