Legal Opinion

Lawhorn v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1987No. S.F. 25099PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

The Review Department of the State Bar Court recommended, with two members dissenting, that petitioner Victor R. Lawhorn be disbarred from the practice of law for mishandling client funds. Although petitioner was charged with and found to have committed four violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct, all arose from the same transaction between petitioner (a relatively inexperienced attorney) and his client. In these circumstances, and taking into account mitigating factors in the case, we conclude that disbarment would be excessive discipline and that petitioner should…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Chefsky v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Alberton v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Greenbaum v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Zitny v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. In Re DemergianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. In Re LambCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Gary v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. In Re YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Kelly v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API