Legal Opinion

Bernstein v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1972No. L. A. 29839PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding under Business and Professions Code section 6083, subdivision (a) and rule 59(a) of the California Rules of Court, to review a recommendation of the State Bar Disciplinary Board. The petitioner, Albert Martin Bernstein, was admitted to the practice of law in this state on June 11, 1958. He has no prior record of discipline.

Local Administrative Committee Number 26 for Los Angeles County found that petitioner wilfully violated rule 9 of the State Bar Rules of Professional Conduct by commingling his clients’ funds with his own. It further found that he…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Zitny v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Eschwig v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Best v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Peck v. the State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Hildebrand v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Emslie v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Chefsky v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KumberaWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Giovanazzi v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API