Legal Opinion

La Chance v. Brown

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 9, 1919No. Civ. No. 2828PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

Action to recover the sum of $1,071 paid by the plaintiff to the defendants on account of a contract for the purchase of real property, which contract it is alleged was abandoned by the defendants, and rescinded. From a judgment awarding to the plaintiff the sum of $411, the defendants appeal.

The complaint alleged that immediately after the signing of the contract the plaintiff and defendants entered into a supplemental agreement to the effect that a certain policy of insurance upon the improvements on the land was for the benefit of the plaintiff, and that in case of loss of the premises by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Stevinson v. JoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Brimmer v. SalisburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Conlin v. OsbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Odegaard v. MoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. Lubarsky v. ChavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. McLane v. Van EatonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Ross v. McDougalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Kelly v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API