Legal Opinion

Odegaard v. Moe

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 21, 1962No. 38,609PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas Gallagher, Justice.

Action in unlawful detainer instituted in the municipal court of Minneapolis by plaintiffs, William E. Odegaard and Irene Smith Ode-gaard, vendors in a contract for deed dated April 25, 1960, of certain premises in Hennepin County described as Lot 1, Block 1, C. A. Bartlett’s Addition to Minneapolis. Defendants are vendees in such contract, and the action is based upon the claim that they unlawfully retained possession of such premises after plaintiffs’ cancellation of the contract for deed.

The stipulated facts establish that the cancellation proceedings followed the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hoppin v. MunseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Cheff v. HaanMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Johnson v. FeskensOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Jandric v. SkahenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. Gannaway v. TolerMississippi Supreme Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Babb's, Inc. v. BabbSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  2. Cohler v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  3. Sadler v. BallantyneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Thomey v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Credit, Inc. v. KutzikSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API