Legal Opinion

Cook v. Carter

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 3, 1916No. 1831PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from County Court, Tillman County; T. E. Campbell, Judge. Action by Wm. Cook against F. C. Carter and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

GALBRAITE., C.

This was an action in replevin instituted in the justice of the peace court, involving the ownership and right to the possession of the following household goods, to wit:

“One extention table, one stand table, one iron bed, one cot, one steel cot, one set of bed springs, and four dining chairs, of the value of $15.”

There was judgment for the plaintiff. On appeal to the county court there was a trial de novo upon an agreed statement of facts.

It appears that the property involved was in the possession of and being used by one Rice, who was the tenant of the defendant in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hixon v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. Chandler v. ColcordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1893
  3. Rice v. NolanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  4. Kershaw v. WilleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Irwin v. WallingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cross v. IngeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API