Rice v. Nolan
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Franklin District Court. The opinion states the nature of the action, and the material facts. Trial at the September Term, 1883, and judgment for plaintiff Nolan, and against defendants Rice and A. and J. Trowistine & Co., for $246.70 and costs. Defendants bring the case to this court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
JOHNSTON, J.:
This was an action brought by Carroll Nolan, the defendant in error, in the district court of Franklin county, against the plaintiffs in error, to recover the value of a *29certain stock in trade, alleged to have been exempt, which was seized and sold by J. H. Rice, as constable, upon an order of attachment issued by a justice of the peace in an action brought by A. and J. Trounstine & Co.
It appears from the findings made by the court below, that Carroll Nolan was engaged in business at Ottawa, Kansas, as a merchant tailor, and that on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State ex rel. Fulkerson v. EmmersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
- Bramble v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
- Wicker v. ComstockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- Arthur v. WallaceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Bayne v. PattersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Noyes v. BeldingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- State v. GoeringSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
- First International Bank v. LeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Bashinski v. TalbottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1902
- Armstrong-Turner Millinery Co. v. RoundSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.