Legal Opinion
Speedry Products, Inc. v. Dri Mark Products, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 6, 1959No. 335, Docket 25550PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Speedry Products, Inc., plaintiff-appellant (Speedry) appeals from an order denying its motion for a preliminary injunction by which it sought to enjoin defendants-appellees (collectively referred to as “Dri Mark”) from importing, manufacturing and selling a marking device known as “Dri Mark” on the grounds that it infringed the patents on Speedry’s device known as “Magic Marker” and that it “is so similar in appearance to the ‘Magic Marker’ that it will deceive the public into thinking that it comes from the same source as the ‘Magic Marker’.” Upon argument of the *648motion…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- International News Service v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Maternally Yours, Inc. v. Your Maternity Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Joshua Meier Company, Inc. v. Albany Novelty Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Chas. D. Briddell, Inc. v. Alglobe Trading Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- L.A. Gear, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Thom McAn Shoe Company and Melville Corporation and Pagoda Trading Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Continental Oil Company v. The Frontier Refining CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- Bose Corporation v. Linear Design Labs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Blazon, Inc. v. DeLuxe Game Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Gillette Company v. Ed Pinaud, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.