Legal Opinion
Continental Oil Company v. The Frontier Refining Company
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 1, 1964No. 7895_1PublishedCited by 155 opinions
1Per curiam
This appeal is from an interlocutory order entered by the court below granting a preliminary injunction.
The action was commenced by appellee, The Frontier Refining Company (Frontier), under the provisions of the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 730, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S. C.A. § 13, and under section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1. It was brought to enjoin certain alleged unlawful pricing practices on the part of appellant, Continental Oil Company (Continental) and to recover treble-damages for the injuries suffered as a result of such practices.
The complaint prayed for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hamilton Watch Co. v. Benrus Watch Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Federal Trade Commission v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Federal Trade Commission v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Leon F. Urbain and Loxit Systems, Inc. v. Knapp Brothers Manufacturing Company, Al Levinson, Charles Levinson, and Robert LevinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
- Tanner Motor Livery, Ltd. v. Avis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by155 opinions
- Heideman v. South Salt Lake CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Daryl B. Lundgrin v. W. Graham Claytor, Secretary of the Navy of the United States, and the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Greater Yellowstone Coalition v. FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Janich Bros., Inc. v. The American Distilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Winnebago Tribe v. StovallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
150 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.