Legal Opinion

Gillette Company v. Ed Pinaud, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 7, 1959PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FREDERICK van PELT BRYAN, District Judge.

This is an action for trademark infringement and unfair competition. Plaintiff manufactures and sells a line of products for women’s hair under the name “Toni”, and a hair spray called “Adorn, by Toni”. Defendant manufactures and sells hair preparations for both men and women and a hair spray under the name “Tonieream”, among others.

Plaintiff moves to restrain defendant, pending the trial of the action, from using the name “Tonieream” in the marketing of defendant’s hair spray, alleging that such conduct infringes upon its trademark registration of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Maternally Yours, Inc. v. Your Maternity Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  4. My-T Fine Corporation v. SamuelsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  5. American Airlines, Inc. v. Forman, Judge. Slick Airways, Inc. v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Citibank, N.A. And Citicorp v. Citytrust and Citytrust Bancorp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  2. Gte Corporation v. David R. Williams, D/B/A General TelephoneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  3. Lydo Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Las VegasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. The Arc of California v. Toby DouglasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Ivy Mar Co., Inc. v. CR Seasons Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API