Legal Opinion

Bose Corporation v. Linear Design Labs, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 21, 1972No. 920, Docket 71-2207PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GURFEIN, District Judge.

Bose Corporation (Bose) appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Motley, J.), 340 F.Supp. 513, denying, after hearing, a motion for a preliminary injunction against infringement of the Bose patent issued June 1, 1971 relating to a pair of high fidelity loudspeakers known as the Bose 901. Judge Motley also refused to enjoin the defendant Linear Design Labs, Inc. (LDL) pendente lite from distributing its similarly designed loudspeakers without placing the name of LDL on a normally visible surface. 1 A motion to…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Cross-Appellant v. mcneil-p.p.c., Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  2. John H. Harland Company, Cross-Appellant v. Clarke Checks, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Lipton v. Nature Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  4. Pignons S. A. De Mecanique De Precision v. Polaroid CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  5. Litton Systems, Inc. v. Whirlpool CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API