Greiner v. Kirkpatrick
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Defendant Lois A. Kirkpatrick * appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff enjoining defendant from interfering with plaintiff’s use of a right of way.
Question's Presented
1. Is plaintiff estopped to assert any easement 1 2. Did the court include in the casement more land than reasonably necessary to accomplish its purpose? 3. The effect of the injunction in requiring defendant to remove a portion of a certain wall.
Facts
The controversy arises over the use by plaintiff of a certain area required to enable her to get in and out of her garage, over which area she originally received a grant of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. GandyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Parks v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Holland v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Butte Creek Consol. Dredging Co. v. OlneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Security-First National Bank v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Domarad v. Fisher & Burke, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Haley v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Meyer v. Glenmoor Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- TRIPLE a MANAGEMENT CO. v. FrisoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Fontana v. UppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.