Butte Creek Consol. Dredging Co. v. Olney
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Tucker, Kenyon & Macfarland, J. Z. Tucker, and White, Miller, Needham & Harber, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Defendants appeal from an adverse judgment and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
The litigation concerns certain contracts for the sale and purchase of real property. On April 8, 1907, an agreement in writing was made by defendants and plaintiff’s predecessors in interest by the terms of which the Olneys, parties of the first part, in consideration of the sum of five thousand dollars, receipt of which was thereby acknowledged, arid in further consideration of the covenants and promised future payments provided by the contract, gave and granted to the “parties of the second…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Stevinson v. JoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Oursler v. ThacherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Wheeler v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1887
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Retsloff v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Anderson v. WillsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Holmes v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.