Legal Opinion
Meyer v. Glenmoor Homes, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 9, 1966No. Civ. 22881PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSims, J.
Defendant corporation has appealed from a judgment for plaintiff entered on a jury verdict, and from an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict in an action on a $25,000 note signed under the corporate name by plaintiff’s deceased husband, the president of the corporation.
In its answer the corporation, in addition to a general denial, set forth lack of authority of the signer of the note, and lack of consideration. The case was submitted to the jury on these issues, and on the theory of equitable estoppel, as it applied both in favor of and against the payee.…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Engstrom v. Auburn Automobile Sales Corp.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Simmons v. California Institute of TechnologyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, As Receiver v. O'melveny & MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Peregrine Funding, Inc. v. Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Snukal v. Flightways Manufacturing, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Bank of New York v. Fremont General Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5839, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9981 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver American Diversified Savings Bank Adc Financial Corp. American Diversified Wells Park III v. O'Melveny & MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.