Legal Opinion

Fontana v. Upp

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 20, 1954No. Civ. 15982PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendants in an action in which plaintiff sought damages for breach of a lease of certain premises owned by defendants and which plaintiff desired for the operation of a bakery business. The complaint alleged failure of respondents to place appellant in possession of property pursuant to a lease, and the answer denied that the lease ever became legally effective, alleging that the document was subject to a condition precedent which had never occurred. Evidence of the condition precedent was offered at the trial without objection, and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Burke v. DulaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Hansen v. Bear Film Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Huth v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Severance v. Knight-Counihan Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Westphal v. WestphalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sheffet v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Vernon Fire Fighters v. City of VernonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Louis Lesser Enterprises, Ltd. v. RoederCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Haines v. BechdoltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Michael Distributing Co. v. TobinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API