Legal Opinion

Turnbull v. LaRose

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1985No. S-313, S-327PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

Appellants Dennis Turnbull and Rodger Bigby, d/b/a Denro Investments (Denro), are purchasers of the Mueller Building, a structure in downtown Anchorage. Appel-lees include Mueller Building Investors and Robert D. Mueller, the previous owner of the building, and Collette LaRose and Tur-nagain-by-the-Sea, Inc., d/b/a Marston Real Estate, the real estate agent and agency that negotiated the sale of the building. Appellants contend there were material misrepresentations in connection with the sale of the building. The superior court granted appellees’ motion for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Vera Croley, Etc. v. Matson Navigation Company, David E. Bouler v. Matson Navigation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  2. Liebergesell v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Selman v. ShirleyOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Rice v. PriceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  5. Cousineau v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Shehata v. Salvation ArmyAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Arctic Tug & Barge, Inc. v. Raleigh, Schwarz & PowellAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Winschel v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State, Department of Natural Resources v. Transamerica Premier Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Gouger v. HardtkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API