Legal Opinion

Cousineau v. Walker

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1980No. 4551PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOOCHEVER, Justice.

The question in this case is whether the appellants are entitled to rescission of a land sale contract because of false statements made by the sellers. The superior court concluded that the buyers did not rely on any misrepresentations made by the sellers, that the misrepresentations were not material to the transaction, and that reliance by the buyers was not justified. Restitution of money paid under the contract was denied. We reverse and remand the case to the superior court to determine the amount of damages owed the appellants.

In 1975, Devon Walker and his wife…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Humber v. MortonTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Carpenter v. DonohoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  3. Moxley v. Laramie Builders, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Kannavos v. AnninoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
  5. Yorke v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Consumer Protection Division Office of the Attorney General v. Consumer Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Norton v. PoplosSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  3. State v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Mahler v. Keenan Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  5. Bevins v. BallardAlaska Supreme Court · 1982

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API