Legal Opinion

Arctic Tug & Barge, Inc. v. Raleigh, Schwarz & Powell

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1998No. S-7908PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Arctic Tug & Barge, Inc. (Arctic) appeals a partial final judgment dismissing its third- party claim against Raleigh, Schwarz & Powell, Inc. (Raleigh). Raleigh, an insurance broker, procured coverage for Alaska Corporation (Alaska) on materials that Alaska had hired Arctic to transport. The materials came to harm, Alaska sued Arctic, and Arctic impled Raleigh. Arctic claimed that Raleigh had negligently misrepresented to it the terms of the insurance policy that Raleigh had procured for Alaska, and had thereby exposed Arctic to unexpected liability for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BlackMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Webb v. City and Borough of SitkaAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Swenson Trucking & Excavating, Inc. v. Truckweld Equipment Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Miller v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Turnbull v. LaRoseAlaska Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Mallet v. PickensWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Guerrero Ex Rel. Guerrero v. Alaska Housing Finance Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Shehata v. Salvation ArmyAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Sowinski v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Winschel v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API