Kennecott Copper Corp. v. Industrial Commission of Utah
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CALLISTER, Justice:
Kennecott Copper Corporation to have this court review an award to Robert E. Markus. granted by The Industrial Commission. It is the contention of Kennecott that the Commission did not have jurisdiction to make the award. We agree.
On August 26, 1964, Markus filed a claim for workman's compensation for an injury allegedly ‘ suffered while in the coursé of employment with Kennecott. After a hearing at which no medical testimony was permitted, the Commission, on February 17, 1965, entered an order denying the claim. Markus filed an application for, a rehearing which the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Salt Lake City v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1923
- Carter v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1930
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Ind. Comm. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1929
- Spencer v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1955
- Ferguson v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Buxton v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF UTAHUtah Supreme Court · 1978
- Employers' Reinsurance Fund v. Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Retherford v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF UTAHCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987