Legal Opinion

Retherford v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF UTAH

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided June 22, 1987No. 870016-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss of defendant American Telephone and Telegraph (AT & T). AT & T seeks dismissal of plaintiff’s petition for writ of review, contending that it was not timely filed under Utah Code Ann. § 35-1-83 (1986). We agree that the petition for review was not timely filed and dismiss the petition.

I

Plaintiff Debra S. Retherford applied for workers’ compensation benefits claiming she had suffered injuries from a compensa-ble industrial accident. On October 21, 1986, an administrative law judge ordered the claim dismissed, with prejudice. 1 The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Salt Lake City v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Drury v. LuncefordUtah Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Pease v. Industrial Com'n of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Chambers v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  5. Spencer v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Varian-Eimac, Inc. v. LamoreauxCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  2. Monarrez v. Utah Department of TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Young v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Ring v. Industrial Commission, Second Injury FundCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API