Retherford v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF UTAH
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Per curiam
This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss of defendant American Telephone and Telegraph (AT & T). AT & T seeks dismissal of plaintiff’s petition for writ of review, contending that it was not timely filed under Utah Code Ann. § 35-1-83 (1986). We agree that the petition for review was not timely filed and dismiss the petition.
I
Plaintiff Debra S. Retherford applied for workers’ compensation benefits claiming she had suffered injuries from a compensa-ble industrial accident. On October 21, 1986, an administrative law judge ordered the claim dismissed, with prejudice. 1 The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Salt Lake City v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1923
- Drury v. LuncefordUtah Supreme Court · 1966
- Pease v. Industrial Com'n of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Chambers v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Spencer v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Varian-Eimac, Inc. v. LamoreauxCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- Monarrez v. Utah Department of TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 2016
- Young v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Ring v. Industrial Commission, Second Injury FundCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987