Legal Opinion

Employers' Reinsurance Fund v. Labor Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 2012No. Nos. 20110033, 20110055PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice DURHAM,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

T1 Sunnyside Coal Company, the Workers' Compensation Fund, and the Employers' Reinsurance Fund (collectively, Petitioners) challenge the Labor Commission's award of *575permanent total disability benefits to claimant Cecil Henningson. Petitioners argue that the award is barred under the relevant statute of limitation, which prevents the Labor Commission from acquiring jurisdiction and making the award. We conclude that the Commission correctly determined that it had original jurisdiction over the claim and also correctly exercised its continuing…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Allen v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Salt Lake City v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Vigos v. Mountainland Builders, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Frito-Lay v. Utah Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Olsen v. Samuel McIntyre Investment Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Provo City v. Utah Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Waite v. Utah Labor Comm'nUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Petersen v. Utah Labor Comm'nUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Smiley v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  5. A & B Mechanical Contractors v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API