Legal Opinion
Globe Savings Bank, F.S.B. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 19, 2003No. 91-1550CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
This Winstar-related case1 concerns a thrift banking institution located in Oklahoma. The government’s liability for breach of contract has been established, see Globe Sav. Bank, FSB v. United States, 55 Fed.Cl. 247 (2003) (granting plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on liability and denying defendant’s cross-motion), but the amount of damages has not. Before the Court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment on damages, respecting which a hearing was held on November 7, 2003. The motion is granted in part and denied in part for the reasons stated…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Glendale Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Long Island Savings Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Columbia First Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Globe Savings Bank, F.S.B. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Globe Savings Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Bank of America, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.