Legal Opinion
Globe Savings Bank v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 24, 2004No. 91-1550CPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
Trial on damages in this Winstar-related case1 is scheduled to commence on July 12, 2004.2 In preparation for that trial, plaintiffs (“Globe and Phoenix” or “Globe”) have filed several motions raising evidentiary and procedural issues. The motions are styled as follows: (1) Plaintiffs Globe and Phoenix’s Motion to Introduce Deposition Testimony of Government Official Jack T. Reidhill (“Pis.’ Reidhill Mot.”), (2) Plaintiff Globe and Phoenix’s Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Defendant’s Proffered Expert Witness David J. Ross (“Pis.’ Ross Mot.”), (3) Plaintiffs Globe and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Founding Church of Scientology of Washington, D.C., Inc. v. William H. Webster, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Michael BarileCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- L-3 Communications Integrated Systems, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Hitkansut LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Rodriguez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Scott Timber, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- In Re Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.