Long Island Savings Bank, FSB v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
This Winstar-related ease1 is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment on damages.2 Following briefing, a hearing was held on November 25, 2003. Because genuine issues of material fact exist regarding expectancy damages, plaintiffs’ motion is denied and defendant’s motion is denied in part and granted in part.3
BACKGROUND
The Long Island Savings Bank was organized in 1876 as a New York State chartered mutual savings bank. Def.’s App., Ex. 42 at WOQ632 1702 (Long Island Bancorp’s Prospectus (Feb. 14, 1994)). Headquartered in Syosset, New York, the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- PGBA, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Franconia Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- System Fuels, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Globe Savings Bank, F.S.B. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.