Legal Opinion
Globe Savings Bank, F.S.B. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 29, 2005No. 91-1550CPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
INTRODUCTION
In this Winstar-related case,1 plaintiff Globe Savings Bank, F.S.B. (“Globe”) was a thrift savings bank that operated in Oklahoma in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Phoenix Capital Group, Inc. (“Phoenix”) was the holding company for all of the stock of Globe. The enactment of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (“FIRREA”) on August 9, 1989, Pub.L. No. 101-73, 103 Stat. 183 (codified in scattered sections of Title 12 of the U.S.Code, including 12 U.S.C. § 1464), removed the regulatory underpinnings for Globe’s capital…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Glendale Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Bluebonnet Savings Bank, F.S.B., Stone Capital, Inc. (Formerly Known as Cfsb Corporation), and James M. Fail v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- California Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Energy Capital Corp. (As General Partner of Energy Capital Partners Limited Partnership) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Anchor Savings Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- First Federal Lincoln Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- American Federal Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Long Island Savings Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.