Legal Opinion
Bank of America, FSB v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 21, 2005No. Nos. 95-660C, 95-797C, 95-7971CPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WIESE, Judge.
This decision follows a trial on damages held from July 12-29 and resuming from August 23-September 2, 2004. At trial, plaintiff Bank of America sought $68.972 million in expectancy damages resulting from the government’s breach of a contract allowing, inter alia, plaintiffs predecessor institution to count supervisory goodwill and subordinated debt toward its regulatory capital requirements. After reviewing the parties’ post-trial submissions, the court heard closing arguments on May 10, 2005. For the reasons set forth below, we now find that plaintiff is entitled to…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Duquesne Light Co. v. BaraschSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lasalle Talman Bank, F.S.B. v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bluebonnet Savings Bank FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- American Federal Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Bank of America, FSB v. DoumaniCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Bank of America, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Long Island Savings Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.