Legal Opinion
State v. Duhamel
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided June 5, 1986No. 85-377PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.
The defendant, Mark R. Duhamel, appeals the Trial Court’s (DiClerico, J.) denial of his plea that a retrial after the granting of a defense-requested mistrial be barred on double jeopardy grounds. We affirm.
On March 11, 1984, the defendant entered the Manchester police station and confessed to the February 2, 1982 killing of Paul Laflamme. He was subsequently indicted for second degree murder. RSA 630:l-b. At trial, Duhamel maintained that he had killed Laflamme in self-defense. The defendant offered the following account of the events leading up to the killing. Laflamme picked up the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- In Re DoeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- State v. DuketteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. Michael J.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. AyerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- State v. ZwickerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- State v. MartiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- State v. LiakosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.