State v. Liakos
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
The defendant, Daniel Liakos, brings an interlocutory appeal from a ruling of the Superior Court (Mohl, J.), see SUP. CT. *728R. 8, denying his motion to dismiss a negligent homicide indictment. RSA 630:3, I (1996). The defendant argues that retrial of this indictment is barred by the Double Jeopardy Clause of the State Constitution. We affirm and remand.
The following facts were adduced at trial. On August 9, 1992, the defendant was driving south on the Spaulding Turnpike. The defendant crossed the double yellow line to pass several vehicles,cut sharply in front of other vehicles, and swerved on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. WongSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- State v. MacLeodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- State v. DuhamelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- State v. LuciusSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. BurgessSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- State v. NicklesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- State v. FarrSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- State v. McKeanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- State of New Hampshire v. Jamie LockeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.