Legal Opinion
State v. Marti
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided November 13, 2001No. 2000-328PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.
The defendant, Antonio Marti, brings this interlocutory appeal from an order of the Superior Court {T. Nadeau, J.) denying his motion to dismiss. See SüP. Ct. R. 8. He contends that his prosecution for aggravated felonious sexual assault, see RSA 632-A:2 (1986 & Supp. 1991) (amended 1992,1994,1995,1997,1998,1999) is barred by double jeopardy. We affirm and remand.
The defendant was indicted on three counts of aggravated felonious sexual assault in 1994. The three separate indictments charged him with: (1) anal intercourse with a person under thirteen years of age; (2) anal intercourse with the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Pool v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ex Parte MasonheimerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- People v. BattsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Ex Parte Graves, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
- State v. GlennSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- Commonwealth v. Johnson, K., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.