Legal Opinion

Oregon v. Kennedy

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 24, 1982No. 80-1991PublishedCited by 1,787 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rehnquist

The Oregon Court of Appeals decided that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution barred respondent’s retrial after his first trial ended in a mistrial granted on his own motion. 49 Ore. App. 415, 619 P. 2d 948 (1980), cert. granted, 454 U. S. 891 (1981). The Court of Appeals concluded that retrial was barred because the prosecutorial misconduct that occasioned the mistrial in the first instance amounted to “overreaching.” Because that court took an *669overly expansive view of the application of the Double Jeopardy Clause following a mistrial resulting…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,787 opinions

  1. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. Dinkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  4. Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. State v. SageOhio Supreme Court · 1987

1,782 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API