Legal Opinion

Connor v. Township of Chanhassen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 8, 1957No. 36,953PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Murphy, Justice.

This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment action in which the plaintiffs, Dwight E. Connor and his wife, Gladys Z. Connor, sought to have the Zoning Ordinance for the Township of Chanhassen declared unconstitutional.

The plaintiffs own certain land in the township of Chanhassen upon which Mr. Connor operates a shop for sharpening lawn mowers and other types of general repair work. In 1952, the plaintiffs had to destroy their building pursuant to condemnation proceedings commenced by the State of Minnesota to acquire a highway right-of-way. The zoning ordinance was passed in…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Banner Milling Co. v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. City of Los Angeles v. GageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Forbes v. HubbardIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  5. O'Connor v. City of MoscowIdaho Supreme Court · 1949

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Hoffmann v. KinealySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  2. Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minnesota, Inc. v. Village of MinnetonkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  3. McShane v. City of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Fanale v. Borough of Hasbrouck HeightsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  5. Pascack Ass'n, Ltd. v. Mayor & Coun. Washington Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API