Legal Opinion
Banner Milling Co. v. State of New York
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 15, 1925PublishedCited by 102 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.
Pursuant to chapter 746 of the Laws of 1911, known as the Barge Canal Terminal Act, and its amendments, the State appropriated appellant’s property in the city of Buffalo, used by it for a flour mill. The property had been used for the manufacture of flour since 1887 and for the past ten years the business had produced for the claimant averaged earnings of over $50,000 annually. The State did not appropriate the business or intend to carry on the business. It sought the land and its appurtenances for .Barge canal purposes. All fixtures as far as possible were to be removed by the owner.
The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Des Moines Gas Co. v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- City of Omaha v. Omaha Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- City and County of Denver v. Denver Union Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- City of Oakland v. Pacific Coast Lumber & Mill Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Matter of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- City of Buffalo v. J. W. Clement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Matter of City of New York (Allen St.)New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Matter of Board of Water Supply of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- United States v. Becktold Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.