Legal Opinion

Fanale v. Borough of Hasbrouck Heights

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 17, 1958PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Weintuatjb, C. J.

The complaint attacked the validity of a supplement to a zoning ordinance. While the action was pending plaintiffs applied for a variance or exception which was denied, and by amendment of the complaint they sought as well a review of that refusal. The trial judge found the supplement to be invalid and for that reason did not pass upon the action of the board of adjustment. The appeal challenges the judgment as entered. The action of the board of adjustment is not before us.

We certified the appeal on our own motion before determination…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Connor v. Township of ChanhassenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  3. Matter of Fox Meadow Estates, Inc. v. CulleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. Fox Meadow Estates, Inc. v. CulleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  5. Valley View Village, Inc. v. ProffettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. TAXPAYERS ASSN. OF WEYMOUTH TP. INC. v. Weymouth Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  2. Lusardi v. Curtis Point Property Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  3. Gruber v. Mayor and Tp. Com. of Raritan Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  4. Willdel Realty, Inc. v. New Castle CountySupreme Court of Delaware · 1971
  5. Tp. of Washington v. CENT. BERGEN COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER, INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API