O'Connor v. City of Moscow
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HYATT, Justice.
Respondents are, and since 1938 have been, the owners of certain real estate and a business building thereon, located along Main Street, but south of First Street, in the business section of the City of Moscow, in which they now do, and have for some several years last past, conducted a combined pool hall, card room, and retail beer parlor.
On April 21, 1947 said City adopted an ordinance providing that from and after the effective date thereof, it should be unlawful to open or operate any new or additional place of business located on First Street, or on any street south of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Jones v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Thayer v. Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Austin v. OlderMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Hoffmann v. KinealySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Cole-Collister Fire Protection District v. City of BoiseIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
- Connor v. Township of ChanhassenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Weller v. HopperIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
- Boise City v. Better Homes, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.