Institute of Protestant Deaconesses v. Lingenfelser
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Frazer,
This action of ejectment is to recover a lot of ground in the City of Pittsburgh, in possession of defendant, appellant here, who claims title in fee, alleging he entered upon and took possession of the property in pursuance of a parol grant and conveyance to him by plaintiff, subject to the payment of graded annual ground rents reserved out of the land, payment of these rents to extend over a period of twenty years as follows: $100 per year to be paid during the first period of five years; $105 for the next succeeding five years; $110 for the next succeeding five…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mott v. KaldesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Dumn v. RothermelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Newman v. RutterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1839
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brenner v. LesherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Holland Furnace Co. v. Keystone Dehydrating Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Jones Et Ux. v. StifflerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Ross v. Gulf Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Service Realty Co. v. LuntzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.