Legal Opinion

Holland Furnace Co. v. Keystone Dehydrating Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 9, 1942No. Appeal, 185PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

'This was an action of assumpsit for the use and occupation of land. The plaintiff averred that with its permission the defendant had, during the spring and summer of 1940, entered upon,.and used and occupied for farming purposes, a tract of 24.9 acres owned by plaintiff, on which the defendant had raised and harvested a crop of soy beans; that the reasonable value of said use and occupation was five dollars per acre, but that the defendant had paid nothing.

The defendant admitted the nse and occupation of the land, its harvesting of a crop of soy beans, and that it had…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hart v. CarrollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
  2. Hertzog v. Hertzog's AdministratorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
  3. Rineer v. CollinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. Mott v. KaldesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Dumn v. RothermelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Brotman v. BrotmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Gogel v. BlazofskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Valvano v. GalardiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Lauffer v. VialSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Manley v. ManleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API