Legal Opinion

Jones Et Ux. v. Stiffler

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 2, 1939No. Appeal, 178PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hibt, J.,

This appeal relates to the right of the trial court to mould and reform the verdict of the jury.

Plaintiffs on August 15, 1931, in writing, leased to defendant two pieces of adjoining land with “a refreshment stand” erected on one of them and a gasoline service station on the other, for the term of two years at a yearly rental of $2,000 payable in specified monthly installments. The writing provides: ‘■‘The lease of said building shall include all fixtures and appliances now installed and in use in the refreshment building.” Defendant paid the rent for the first year and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gail v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Hollinger v. York Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  3. Ralston v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Newman v. RutterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1839
  5. Smullin v. HarenskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Burbage v. Boiler Engineering & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. Taylor v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Daley v. John Wanamaker, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Phillips v. SchoenbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Alford v. NealNebraska Supreme Court · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API