Legal Opinion

Mott v. Kaldes

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 1926No. Appeal, 46PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moschzisker,

Equity jurisdiction being invoked by plaintiffs and not questioned by defendant, this case proceeded to trial on bill, answer and proofs. It was adjudged that a certain letter of attorney, hereinafter enlarged upon, did not confer on the agent thereby appointed authority to make a ten-year lease of real estate, which lease also will be more fully described as we proceed. It was further adjudged that, in the absence of such authority, the lease contravened the statute of frauds and, by virtue thereof, had the effect of creating a tenancy at will only,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Foster Home Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  2. Hill v. EpleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
  3. Tustin v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. M'Dowell v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
  5. Davis v. HillmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Polka v. MaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Sferra v. UrlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Del Borrello v. LaulettaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Culbertson v. CookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Schenker v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API